Personal tools
You are here: Home Topics drug war

drug war

Jun 02, 2009

interesting HuffPost blog about an upcoming article.

by Mickey Martin — last modified Jun 02, 2009 03:16 AM
Filed Under:

And the discussion continues to boil, and the "drug warriors" continue to lose ground.

Kristof Asks Readers: Should US Legalize Drugs?


First Posted: 06- 1-09 05:03 PM   |   Updated: 06- 1-09 06:10 PM

 
 
 
 
Marijuana
 
 
 

Nicholas Kristof wants to know: Should the U.S. legalize drugs?

The influential New York Times columnist posted the question, which is being asked in mainstream circles with increasing frequency, on his Facebook page Saturday evening. Opinions have come pouring in.

"I'm thinking of writing this coming week about whether legalization of drugs makes sense. Any thoughts out there or good resources?" he asked.

Kristof told the Huffington Post he likes to reach out to readers for help when he's entering into not-entirely-familiar territory.

"It certainly prompted a lot of interesting thoughts, a lot of references to organizations involved, and one organization also reached out by phone to me. Maybe I would have come across the same organization, or maybe not, but on a topic that I don't know so well it can be a really useful tool," he said. "I find that on some issues it's completely useless, but on topics that especially involve experiences that I don't have, or knowledge that I don't have, then reaching out actually works pretty well."

One topic that doesn't work well with crowd-sourcing, Kristof said is the Middle East. "You get half the people with extreme views on the one side and half the people with extreme views on the other, and it's all heat and no light. And it's all arguments that I've already heard before," he said.

Tom Angell, a flak for the group Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, left Kristof a message after a friend at Students for Sensible Drug Policy alerted him to the query.

"Facebook and other social networking sites like Digg and Twitter have proven to be an essential tool for those of us working to drive the discussion on drug legalization from the political fringes to the upper echelons of the mainstream media in recent months," he told the Huffington Post in a g-chat.

Angell, if he connects with Kristof, will encounter a receptive audience.

"It's been a gradual process," said Kristof about his thinking leading to the decision to confront the issue. "I think that the economy being a particular mess makes me a little more skeptical about spending vast amounts of money incarcerating people on drugs, and then I think the degree to which Mexico has been erupting also has made me wonder."

Kristof has traveled widely for his reporting and filed stories from a number of war zones. "The Taliban financing itself in part with opium has made me also wonder about the foreign-policy implications of our drug policies. But it's been something I've kind of wondered about and been ambivalent about for a number of years," said Kristof.

Facebookers who responded to Kristof took his question seriously and largely gave nuanced answers, leaning overwhelmingly in favor of a liberalized policy. His Facebook buds suggested he seek out drug-policy experts Mark Kleiman and Lester Grinspoon, along with Glenn Greenwald, who has recently written about Portugal's experience with decriminalization.

"If you do legalize marijuana, simultaneously implement strict, VERY strict drunk and high driving laws as well as gun laws to try to tame the negative externalities of marijuana use. I believe that the only possible drug to legalize would be marijuana, but I'm skeptical that our culture could handle it. Iowa sure as heck isn't Amsterdam," offered Jacqueline Nalbert Brysacz.

Though many of the posters were personally in favor of reforming drug policy, there was skepticism that the nation could handle legalization, much as Brysacz said.

"I favor legalization/decriminalization in theory, but I wonder how a policy shift of such magnitude would play out in the real world, or if it's even possible," wrote Stephen Wittek. "A lot of deeply entrenched interests, opinions, attitudes and beliefs would have to uprooted or steamrolled, and a lot of people would scream bloody apocalypse. Regardless of whether or not it 'makes sense,' the question at the heart of issue is 'Does America have the stomach for legalization?' And I'm pretty sure the answer is 'no.'"

Kristof will be following in the wake of Time's Joe Klein, CNN's Jack Cafferty, MSNBC's Pat Buchanan, as well as California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, top House Democrat Barney Frank, former Mexican President Vicente Fox and current Mexican Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan, all of whom have called for a rational discussion about drug policy that includes legalization.

Look for his column in the next few weeks. And look for something that moves the conversation forward.

"Increasingly, I'm thinking that legalization arguments are stronger and stronger," said Kristof.

May 21, 2009

A Good and Relevant Article from Canada

by Mickey Martin — last modified May 21, 2009 01:15 PM
Filed Under:

10 reasons why we need to decriminalize drugs

1. Drug laws are unconstitutional.

Yeah, you’re reading right. Courts at every level have ruled on the fact that drug use and addiction are health issues, not legal infractions. It’s image-conscious politicians who have chosen to wilfully ignore those rulings. Yet the courts have been unwilling to hold lawmakers accountable. It’s a vicious circle – a conspiracy even. 

It’s not clear how marijuana even got on the list of prohibited drugs back in 1923. It mysteriously appeared on the schedule without a debate in Parliament.

2. Drug laws are rooted in racism.

Drug use has been used to demonize whole races of people. From musings about “lazy” Hispanic migrant farm workers partaking of the weed to Chinese opium dens and the accusation by suffragist Emily Murphy – she claimed pot smoking renders users “completely insane… raving maniacs liable to kill” – the earliest drug laws were sold as solutions to a crime problem created by blacks and browns. The ripple effects are being felt today. The 1995 Commission on Systemic Racism in the Justice System identified a continued pattern of racism in drug enforcement: blacks are 27 times more likely to end up in jail to await trial on drug charges than whites, and three times more likely to be charged with trafficking than whites.

3. Drug laws = war, corruption and terrorism.

Think the war in Afghanistan is about the Taliban and al Qaeda? You’re only half right. The war on drugs and the war on terror are often one and the same. 

The propaganda fed us by the self-interested, i.e., cops and politicians, is that drug use is what fuels the drug trade. Reality check: smart policy-makers know it’s prohibition that creates the black market that makes the drug trade so lucrative. See Colombia, where the illegal cocaine trade has fuelled a five-decade civil war. And what about 9/11? 

According to a report by John Thompson of the Mackenzie Institute, money from drugs is “probably the single biggest money earner” for Muslim fundamentalists.

4. Drug laws encourage the spread of disease.

Nearly two-thirds of offenders entering the federal corrections system have drug abuse problems. Sending addicts to jail on minor drug charges is a death sentence for many. The spread of HIV/AIDS and other diseases like hep C only accelerates behind bars. 

About 15 per cent of the jail population reports injecting heroin or cocaine behind bars. Former inmates say they’ve seen as many as 40 fellow inmates sharing one needle. If that isn’t a recipe.... The feds’ proposed mandatory minimum drug sentences would only jail more people who shouldn’t be there and increase the spread of disease, says the Canadian HIV/AIDS Network.

5. Drug laws are compromising our sovereignty.

DEA agents stationed in Canada,  U.S. drug czars threatening trade sanctions for all that BC bud making it over the border. 

The U.S. propaganda machine hasn’t stopped snorting about our liberal enforcement of drug laws. 

Blame our own lawmakers for pushing the big lie that we can’t reform our drug laws because international conventions keep us tied to the will of other countries (read the U.S). Canada is under no obligation to continue criminal prohibition of drug use. The stated goal of Canada’s Drug Strategy is to reduce harm. The feds have been lying to us.

6. Drug laws have been a complete failure.

Alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs and certain prescription drugs are linked to more than 47,000 deaths and many thousands more injuries and disabilities every year in Canada, according to the Health Officers Council of British Columbia paper Regulation Of Psychoactive Substances In Canada: Seeking A Coherent Public Health Approach. That’s not counting the $40 billion blown every year on what the report terms “inadequate, inappropriate and ineffective regulation.” Bottom line: we’re blowing it.      

7. Drug laws are killing the economy.  

The feds estimate total sale of drugs in Canada at about $18 billion annually. BC’s annual marijuana crop alone, if valued at retail street prices and sold by the cigarette, is worth more than $7 billion annually, according to a 2004 study by the Fraser Institute. That’s bigger than mining, logging, manufacturing, construction and agriculture in that province. Do the math. Canada spends $2.3 billion on enforcement every year and another $1.1 in health care costs directly related to illegal drug use – when $1 spent on treatment will achieve the same reduction of flow of cocaine as $7.3 spent on enforcement. 

8. Drug laws amount to cruel and unusual punishment. 

Sending people to jail for the relatively benign act of taking drugs, a victimless “crime,” only exposes them to physical and other forms of abuse behind bars. Now the Harper Tories want to introduce new mandatory minimum sentencing that will only fill prisons with more small-time addicts. Prison admission trends for drug offences are showing dramatic increases. Ontario’s crime rate is comparable to Quebec’s, but our incarceration rate is about one-third higher. 

9. Drug laws are not reducing drug use. 

Governments are slowly coming around to the view. Portugal’s experiment with decriminalization, which started almost a decade ago, has resulted in decreased drug use among teens and a marked reduction in HIV/AIDS infections caused by the sharing of contaminated needles. Portugal’s rate of lifetime marijuana use in people over 15 is now the lowest in the EU: 10 per cent. The EU seems to be coming around on decrim. More than a dozen countries have agreed on a draft resolution urging the UN and its member states to establish a “system for the legal control and regulation of the production, sale and consumption of substances which are currently illegal.” 

10. The majority of Canadians oppose drug laws.

Calls to end prohibition aren’t just coming from weed advocates. The Globe and Ottawa Citizen called for the decriminalization of drugs more than a decade ago. The right-wing Fraser Institute has advocated legalization, calling the war on drugs a “complete failure.” A majority of Canadians support the legalization of pot, according to an Angus Reid poll last year. More than 90 per cent believe it should be legal for medical purposes. The powers that be are messing with the will of the people.

May 16, 2009

End Of A War. Beginning Of An Occupation?

by Mickey Martin — last modified May 16, 2009 01:40 PM
Filed Under:

As relieving as it is to hear the nation's drug czar say he would like to put an end to the term "War on Drugs," it is not necessarily the words that are the dangerous aspect of this battle. We continue to see the backwards thinking associated with drug enforcement alive and well in our community. There are still hundreds of thousands citizens caught in harm's way for their decision to use or addiction to any number of drugs. It is one thing to say all of the right things, but it is another thing to actually do something to change the actions, not the words, that leave so many lives shattered and makes criminals out of the most vulnerable in our society.

The campaign of misinformation continues. Government funded studies continue to attempt to scare our citizenry with their exaggerated "facts" and unfounded realizations. Funny how these reports are released any time someone mentions reforming our policies on drug use. As if they have been waiting for the moment to tell us that, "THC levels are rising from 9.6% to 10.1% and this will put everyone in the danger of psychosis somehow." Who believes this poppycock anymore? I am glad THC levels are rising. That means more growers are doing a better job of caring for their products. Or maybe this is a result of the shift from our government confiscating samples from less potent mexican producers and increasing their offensive in domestic producers of cannabis medicines. This may have skewed their medium numbers resulting in a more realistic average. Who cares?

THC is the least harmful part of smoking cannabis. The higher percentage of THC means a lower content of carcinogens and non-active ingredients that are suspect of causing harm. A higher content of THC is simply a more efficient drug, not more dangerous. This is another smoke screen bought and paid for by the opposition. Yes. Our government, and their pathetic studies, are in the pocket of big pharma, big tobacco, big alcohol, and any other group who stands to see a decrease in profits should cannabis become legal. It is the lies and misinformation about drug use that need to stop. Changing the name of the battle does not mean the tanks are going to quit firing and that people are going to quit suffering.

I commend our drug czar for seemingly beginning to move the debate in the right direction. I can only hope that his quest for semantics results in a change of approach to this perceived problem. The most dangerous part of drug prohibition is the prohibition. Creating an alter reality and an us vs. them mentality creates opportunity for dangerous crimes to take place in the market of drug trade. It enables people to see themselves as some virtual outlaw for there choice to use cannabis. It creates a fear amongst the good people of this country and allows us to criminalize people for normal behavior. That is right. I said normal. In a world where our President talks openly about his drug use, the past 2 presidents have admitted drug use, and more and more community leaders admit to their use of drugs, it is safe to say that occasionally using cannabis in life is normal.

I am beginning to become somewhat disenchanted with the new administration. They sure know how to say pretty things and talk a good game, but it seems more and more that this lip service is failing to equate into realities and common sense decisions. Of course I do not expect miracles, but with the reversals of decisions on Gitmo, torture, don't ask- don't tell, single payer healthcare, and the President's failure to sign one pardon in his firs 140 days and counting, it seems like there is more talking than acting going on. I understand politics is a tough game and that there are give and take issues that arise. This is how business gets done. Super. Just do me a favor and quit blowing smoke up our rears if you have no intention to really follow through. 

Is this call for an end to the war on drugs another illusion of compassion, while the policy that supports this effort will continue to be implemented? Can we trust that the deep pockets of our adversaries will allow for their money making war to end this easy? Not a chance. There are prisons to fill and drug tests to give. There are booze to be sold and pills to be distributed. There is a contingency of our lawmakers whom wold rather have a donation for their campaign than find a solution to not locking up the people they are appointed to represent. Until there is a real shift in policy from this administration regarding the way law enforcement treats those who choose to use drugs, we will continue to see the great failure that is now "The artist formerly known as the War on Drugs." 

May 14, 2009

The End to this Brutal War Can Come None Too Soon

by Mickey Martin — last modified May 14, 2009 04:10 AM
Filed Under:

I commend the new Drug Czar on his bold statements. Now let's see some action.

White House Czar Calls for End to 'War on Drugs'

Kerlikowske Says Analogy Is Counterproductive; Shift Aligns With Administration Preference for Treatment Over Incarceration

 

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's new drug czar says he wants to banish the idea that the U.S. is fighting "a war on drugs," a move that would underscore a shift favoring treatment over incarceration in trying to reduce illicit drug use.

In his first interview since being confirmed to head the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday the bellicose analogy was a barrier to dealing with the nation's drug issues.

"Regardless of how you try to explain to people it's a 'war on drugs' or a 'war on a product,' people see a war as a war on them," he said. "We're not at war with people in this country."

Brendan Smialowski for The Wall Street Journal

Gil Kerlikowske, the new White House drug czar, signaled Wednesday his openness to rethinking the government's approach to fighting drug use.

 

Mr. Kerlikowske's comments are a signal that the Obama administration is set to follow a more moderate -- and likely more controversial -- stance on the nation's drug problems. Prior administrations talked about pushing treatment and reducing demand while continuing to focus primarily on a tough criminal-justice approach.

The Obama administration is likely to deal with drugs as a matter of public health rather than criminal justice alone, with treatment's role growing relative to incarceration, Mr. Kerlikowske said.

Already, the administration has called for an end to the disparity in how crimes involving crack cocaine and powder cocaine are dealt with. Critics of the law say it unfairly targeted African-American communities, where crack is more prevalent.

The administration also said federal authorities would no longer raid medical-marijuana dispensaries in the 13 states where voters have made medical marijuana legal. Agents had previously done so under federal law, which doesn't provide for any exceptions to its marijuana prohibition.

During the presidential campaign, President Barack Obama also talked about ending the federal ban on funding for needle-exchange programs, which are used to stem the spread of HIV among intravenous-drug users.

The drug czar doesn't have the power to enforce any of these changes himself, but Mr. Kerlikowske plans to work with Congress and other agencies to alter current policies. He said he hasn't yet focused on U.S. policy toward fighting drug-related crime in other countries.

Mr. Kerlikowske was most recently the police chief in Seattle, a city known for experimenting with drug programs. In 2003, voters there passed an initiative making the enforcement of simple marijuana violations a low priority. The city has long had a needle-exchange program and hosts Hempfest, which draws tens of thousands of hemp and marijuana advocates.

Seattle currently is considering setting up a project that would divert drug defendants to treatment programs.

Mr. Kerlikowske said he opposed the city's 2003 initiative on police priorities. His officers, however, say drug enforcement -- especially for pot crimes -- took a back seat, according to Sgt. Richard O'Neill, president of the Seattle Police Officers Guild. One result was an open-air drug market in the downtown business district, Mr. O'Neill said.

"The average rank-and-file officer is saying, 'He can't control two blocks of Seattle, how is he going to control the nation?' " Mr. O'Neill said.

Sen. Tom Coburn, the lone senator to vote against Mr. Kerlikowske, was concerned about the permissive attitude toward marijuana enforcement, a spokesman for the conservative Oklahoma Republican said.

[drug war]

Others said they are pleased by the way Seattle police balanced the available options. "I think he believes there is a place for using the criminal sanctions to address the drug-abuse problem, but he's more open to giving a hard look to solutions that look at the demand side of the equation," said Alison Holcomb, drug-policy director with the Washington state American Civil Liberties Union.

Mr. Kerlikowske said the issue was one of limited police resources, adding that he doesn't support efforts to legalize drugs. He also said he supports needle-exchange programs, calling them "part of a complete public-health model for dealing with addiction."

Mr. Kerlikowske's career began in St. Petersburg, Fla. He recalled one incident as a Florida undercover officer during the 1970s that spurred his thinking that arrests alone wouldn't fix matters.

"While we were sitting there, the guy we're buying from is smoking pot and his toddler comes over and he blows smoke in the toddler's face," Mr. Kerlikowske said. "You go home at night, and you think of your own kids and your own family and you realize" the depth of the problem.

Since then, he has run four police departments, as well as the Justice Department's Office of Community Policing during the Clinton administration.

Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance, a group that supports legalization of medical marijuana, said he is "cautiously optimistic" about Mr. Kerlikowske. "The analogy we have is this is like turning around an ocean liner," he said. "What's important is the damn thing is beginning to turn."

James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation's largest law-enforcement labor organization, said that while he holds Mr. Kerlikowske in high regard, police officers are wary.

"While I don't necessarily disagree with Gil's focus on treatment and demand reduction, I don't want to see it at the expense of law enforcement. People need to understand that when they violate the law there are consequences."

Support Tainted Compassion Activist Family Fund!

Support us on our exciting adventure and donate today. Your support goes to helping us defend patients rights and giving a voice to providers of cannabis medicines. Through education and outreach we can continue to knock down barriers and make safe access a reality for patients all over the world. To make other arrangements please contact us by e-mail.

Your donation will help fuel our outreach program and help strengthen the voice of medical cannabis providers in the community. Thank you.

« March 2010 »
March
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031